Less than one month after I predicted that the Zionist Cabal might launch a 'false flag' nuclear attack against the U.S. West Coast in order to trigger American conscription for Iraq, the South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo has started highlighting the increasing "threat" posed to the west by North Korea's long range missiles, "much sooner than South Korean and American military authorities had expected."
Remember that you have already been told by the CIA [without any evidence] that North Korea has built "at least two nuclear weapons", so what could be more natural than "crazed Dictator" Kim Jong Il deciding to fire one of them at American territory, especially after the railway marshalling yards at Ryongchon were utterly devastated by a tactical nuclear weapon in late April? This is what Chosun Ilbo had to say in its 4 May edition:
"North Korea has begun work on deploying intermediate range ballistic missiles (with ranges of 3,000~4,000km) it developed last year, building underground bases at two sites. This is much sooner than South Korean and American military authorities had expected.
"A high ranking government source said Tuesday that, 'North Korea is in the middle of building two underground missile sites in Yangdok County, South Pyongan Province and Sangnam-ni, Hochon County, North Hamgyeong Province. Construction is about 70 to 80 percent complete.'
"The [anonymous] source added, 'In particular, U.S. spy satellites have discovered about 10 of the newly designed IRBMs and mobile launchers at the two sites between last year and the beginning of this year... We presume these bases to be for a new kind of ballistic missile, not Rodong 1's or Scud's.'
"Of the ranges of missiles currently deployed in North Korea, the Rodong 1 has the longest at 1,300 km -- capable of hitting most anywhere in Japan. The Taepodong 1, developed in 1998 and with a range of 1,600~2,200 km, has yet to be deployed.
"The[anonymous] source said the threat posed by the new missile, which can reach Okinawa, Gwam and the vicinity of Hawaii, is part of the background behind the hastened development by the U.S. of its missile defense plans. The new missile, unlike the Taepodong 1 that is launched from a fixed site, is loaded onto a mobile missile launch vehicle. It is, therefore, highly mobile.
"The missile is presumed to be a development on the Soviet SS-N-6 sub-launched ballistic missile; it was originally expected to be revealed during last year's Sept. 9 Foundation Day parades, but the 10 missiles and five launchers were simply brought to Mirim Airbase -- the preparation site for the parades -- and not featured in the celebrations.
"The missiles are 12 meters long and 1.5 wide -- shorter than both the Rodong 1 (15 meters) and Taepodong 1 (23 meters), but have a much longer range and are evaluated as a technically advanced type.
"Authorities feel that former Soviet engineers either directly participated in the development of the missile, the program of which began in the early 90s and was first confirmed by South Korean and U.S. intelligence in 2000, or at the very least Russian technology [was] applied."
Within one hour of publication, this obscure South Korean report was displayed prominently on the front page of http://missilethreat.com, itself a sub-division of the American Claremont Institute, which touts its primary skill as, "The Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy". Hmmm... There is nothing very stately or philosophical about nuking your own country for the 'greater good' of Zionism and its lackeys.
Especially worrying about the Chosun Ilbo report is its pointed reference to "sub-launched ballistic missile", which of course is the only method available to America for a 'false flag' launch very close to North Korea, thereby creating the illusion that Kim Jong Il has apparently gone nuts, in turn leading to massed American conscription for Iraq.
Those who think that, "No U.S. Naval Officer would nuke America" are quite right, but, unfortunately, the American submarine captain will have no idea where the missile is going. Since before Gulf War I, all strategic and cruise missiles have been [and still are] remotely targeted from Washington, D.C., giving rise to considerable concern among ship's officers, some of whom have commented in the past that they feel "uneasy" about launching strategic weapons without knowing their targets.